|
By Scott Johnson
Newsweek International
Immigration was supposed to be one of the
top issues on the agenda when the leaders of the United States,
Canada and Mexico gathered for a summit in the city of Waco,
Texas, last week. Conservative TV broadcasters in the United
States deliver rants about America's "broken borders" on
an almost nightly basis, and hundreds of vigilantes are poised to
descend on the arid scrubland of southern Arizona this week to
launch a manhunt for some of the thousands of Mexican workers
crossing into the United States each day. Yet while U.S. President
George W. Bush vowed to redouble efforts to secure congressional
approval of a guest-worker program he unveiled more than a year
ago, he hedged his bets about its passage. "I will continue
to push our Congress to come up with rational, common-sense
immigration policy," Bush said in remarks addressed to
Mexican President Vicente Fox. But, he added, "you don't have
my pledge that Congress will act, because I'm not a member of the
legislative branch."
Inaction, however, may no longer be an
option. Businesses throughout the United States have grown
thoroughly dependent on—and accustomed to—hiring Mexican
laborers. But along the nearly 3,000-kilometer border between the
two countries, tensions are rising to dangerous levels.
Tit-for-tat vendettas between rival drug gangs have transformed
border towns like Matamoros into virtual war zones and left more
than 250 people dead. On the eve of the summit a gun battle
erupted on the streets of Nuevo Laredo, a seven-hour drive from
the site of the meeting, which killed two and wounded seven.
Migrant smugglers, known as coyotes, sometimes get mixed up in the
drug trade as well, while on the American side of the border,
vigilante groups are taking it upon themselves to stem the tide of
migration. "The risk of violence is very real," warns
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agent Charles Griffin.
The U.S. state of Arizona is at the
center of the storm. Voters there approved a ballot initiative
called Proposition 200 last November that imposed sweeping
restrictions on the eligibility of immigrants to receive
state-government services and benefits. The volume of illegal
aliens entering the United States through Arizona has risen
sharply in recent years after federal officials assigned to
California and Texas cracked down; nearly 3,000 people a day now
cross the state's 450-kilometer border with Mexico. All told, an
estimated 500,000 illegal immigrants live in Arizona, and their
swelling ranks have swamped the state's schools, hospitals and
prisons. The constitutionality of Proposition 200 is being
challenged in two separate court cases. But the initiative
garnered widespread support even among Arizona's registered
Hispanic voters, and similar legislation is under consideration in
Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma and Georgia.
Arizona's newfound reputation as the
cradle of the anti-immigration movement has made the state a
magnet for vigilantes. Earlier this year a right-wing organization
calling itself the Civil Homeland Defense invited volunteers to
join a militia that will patrol a 64-kilometer-long stretch of the
Arizona border in search of illegal aliens. The brainchild of an
ex-schoolteacher from California named Chris Simcox, the so-called
Minuteman Project will begin operations on April 1, when he
expects several hundred people to sign up. "The president has
allowed the problem to fester to the point where Americans are
going to take border security into their own hands," says
Simcox, who works out of the offices of the Tombstone Tumbleweed,
a local newspaper. The Mexican government fears its citizens may
suffer human-rights abuses at the hands of Simcox's militiamen.
Washington seems incapable of relieving
the tensions. Some of Bush's fiercest opponents in Congress are
members of his own party. They see his immigration proposal, which
would match a specified number of migrants with American employers
prepared to give them jobs on a temporary basis, as the first step
toward granting illegal aliens U.S. residency. Led by Wisconsin
Congressman James Sensenbrenner, these Republican skeptics have
countered with a bill that cleared the House of Representatives
last January and would, among other things, prohibit state
governments from issuing driver's licenses to illegal residents.
"The immigration system is broken, and there is a complete
vacuum in federal policy," says former U.S. immigration chief
Doris Meissner.
Indeed, no overhaul of U.S. immigration
laws has taken place since the Immigration Reform and Control Act
(IRCA) was enacted in 1986. Nearly 2.7 million, mostly Mexican,
illegal aliens were granted amnesty under IRCA, an outcome that's
steeled the opposition of Republican legislators to the Bush
administration's rather modest proposal, which would license up to
300,000 immigrants to work in the United States for no more than
three years. That would leave unresolved the status of more than
10 million undocumented workers already living in America; Bush
critics argue their continued presence would be tacitly condoned
by even a limited, temporary guest-worker scheme. "The system
we have breeds disrespect," says Dan Stein, director of the
conservative Federation for American Immigration Reform. "They
make a mockery of the idea that there is such a thing as temporary
status in this country."
Some immigration experts counter that any
guest-worker plan that lacks a mechanism for immigrants to
eventually legalize their status would be a nonstarter, both for
the migrants and their U.S. employers, who need a steady and
reliable work force. Many and perhaps most Mexican illegal aliens
already hold jobs in service and manufacturing industries that are
by their very nature permanent employment as opposed to temporary,
seasonal work in agriculture. "What this would do is rotate
temporary workers through permanent jobs," argues Wayne
Cornelius, director of the Center for Immigration Studies at the
University of California, San Diego. "That is an invitation
to massive noncompliance with the terms of the program."
What everyone can agree upon is that the
current system isn't working. A massive increase in Border Patrol
personnel and budgets in recent years has manifestly failed to
lower the number of illegal aliens living in the United States. In
a study conducted by Princeton sociology professor Douglas Massey,
the 2,000 officers working for the Border Patrol in 1986 arrested
1.8 million undocumented workers. By 2003 the number of Border
Patrol agents had risen sixfold, yet the number of arrests had
fallen to 1 million, and the total population of illegal
immigrants in the United States has continued to soar. Massey and
others maintain that the immigrant who has managed to enter the
United States and find work is less likely these days to undertake
an occasional trip home, in part because of stricter
border-enforcement practices that lessen the odds he will be able
to re-enter the country. "We've got more monetary power and
more equipment than at any time in our history," says Massey.
"It's all been counterproductive. You don't deter them from
coming in, you deter them from going home."
Change may be impossible as long as the
huge gap between wages in the United States and points south
persists. "We don't have a choice anymore," says Jorge
Osorio Perez, a 38-year-old Mexican who was arrested in the
Arizona desert along with 23 other immigrants earlier this month.
"We know this is illegal, but it's the only option we have
left." Both the United States and Mexico would be well
advised to create more options, and soon.
© 2006 Newsweek, Inc.
Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7305528/site/newsweek/
Copied on this website only for educational
purpose to be used in class
|